<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andrew Machado - Latest Comments in How Facebook is Pushing Engagement Even When It Comes To Relationships</title><link>http://andrewmachado.disqus.com/</link><description>Andrew Machado's blog</description><atom:link href="https://andrewmachado.disqus.com/how_facebook_is_pushing_engagement_even_when_it_comes_to_relationships/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:47:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How Facebook is Pushing Engagement Even When It Comes To Relationships</title><link>http://www.andrewmachado.com/blog/how-facebook-is-pushing-engagement-even-when-it-comes-to-relationships/#comment-36108617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is cool, but I do see one major issue with this. I guarantee the vast majority of "popular photos" are the ones where someone is making an ugly face, doing something stupid or in a lot of cases partying a little too hard. I do agree, however, that it is a great concept. &lt;br&gt;Best of luck to your friends Ryan and Anette!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BKingston</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:47:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Facebook is Pushing Engagement Even When It Comes To Relationships</title><link>http://www.andrewmachado.com/blog/how-facebook-is-pushing-engagement-even-when-it-comes-to-relationships/#comment-16308069</link><description>&lt;p&gt;YOUR ANNOUNCEMENT PHOTO?!?!... You dropping hints or something?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MacMarried</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:46:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Facebook is Pushing Engagement Even When It Comes To Relationships</title><link>http://www.andrewmachado.com/blog/how-facebook-is-pushing-engagement-even-when-it-comes-to-relationships/#comment-16277429</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Nick,&lt;br&gt;Yeah when i posted this to Twitter I had mentioned no pun intended :)  Thanks for stopping by.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pelechati</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:59:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Facebook is Pushing Engagement Even When It Comes To Relationships</title><link>http://www.andrewmachado.com/blog/how-facebook-is-pushing-engagement-even-when-it-comes-to-relationships/#comment-16277006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure if this was intentional, but based on the title of the article, I understood 'Engagement' to mean a couple is getting in engaged (since the topic is relationships). After reading the article, it seems more like you are talking about how engaged the audience is with material, aka popularity.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:47:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>